<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Photoshop Wrong?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/2007/09/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/2007/09/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/</link>
	<description>The Photography of Brian White</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:59:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian White</title>
		<link>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/2007/09/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-3933</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/23/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/#comment-3933</guid>
		<description>Personally, I would spend the money elsewhere than a shift/tilt lens if what you want it for is perspective correction.  You can do that change easily enough in Gimp or Photoshop.

The tilt, though, is cool if you want your in-focus area to be a &quot;ramp&quot; instead of a vertical plane.

Still, I&#039;d rather have a DC (defocus-control) lens so I can get better &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aguntherphotography.com/reviews/bokeh.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bokeh&lt;/a&gt; in portrait shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I would spend the money elsewhere than a shift/tilt lens if what you want it for is perspective correction.  You can do that change easily enough in Gimp or Photoshop.</p>
<p>The tilt, though, is cool if you want your in-focus area to be a &#8220;ramp&#8221; instead of a vertical plane.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;d rather have a DC (defocus-control) lens so I can get better <a href="http://www.aguntherphotography.com/reviews/bokeh.html" rel="nofollow">bokeh</a> in portrait shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan O'Shea</title>
		<link>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/2007/09/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-3928</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan O'Shea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/23/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/#comment-3928</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the research Brian. I thought it was my crappy lenses or  incompetence that was causing wacky results. Even so, I&#039;m still hoping for a tilt-shift lens from Santa Claus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the research Brian. I thought it was my crappy lenses or  incompetence that was causing wacky results. Even so, I&#8217;m still hoping for a tilt-shift lens from Santa Claus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Eiss</title>
		<link>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/2007/09/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-3898</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Eiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/23/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/#comment-3898</guid>
		<description>Glad to see that you are back.  I hope all is well in the new location.  I can&#039;t wait to see some of your newer work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see that you are back.  I hope all is well in the new location.  I can&#8217;t wait to see some of your newer work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
