<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Photoshop Wrong?</title>
	<link>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/23/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/</link>
	<description>The Photography of Brian White</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Eiss</title>
		<link>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/23/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/#comment-3898</link>
		<author>Larry Eiss</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/23/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/#comment-3898</guid>
					<description>Glad to see that you are back.  I hope all is well in the new location.  I can't wait to see some of your newer work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see that you are back.  I hope all is well in the new location.  I can&#8217;t wait to see some of your newer work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan O'Shea</title>
		<link>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/23/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/#comment-3928</link>
		<author>Brendan O'Shea</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/23/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/#comment-3928</guid>
					<description>Thanks for the research Brian. I thought it was my crappy lenses or  incompetence that was causing wacky results. Even so, I'm still hoping for a tilt-shift lens from Santa Claus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the research Brian. I thought it was my crappy lenses or  incompetence that was causing wacky results. Even so, I&#8217;m still hoping for a tilt-shift lens from Santa Claus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian White</title>
		<link>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/23/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/#comment-3933</link>
		<author>Brian White</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.backgroundexposure.com/blog/index.php/2007/09/23/photoshop-lens-correction-bug/#comment-3933</guid>
					<description>Personally, I would spend the money elsewhere than a shift/tilt lens if what you want it for is perspective correction.  You can do that change easily enough in Gimp or Photoshop.

The tilt, though, is cool if you want your in-focus area to be a "ramp" instead of a vertical plane.

Still, I'd rather have a DC (defocus-control) lens so I can get better &lt;a href="http://www.aguntherphotography.com/reviews/bokeh.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;bokeh&lt;/a&gt; in portrait shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I would spend the money elsewhere than a shift/tilt lens if what you want it for is perspective correction.  You can do that change easily enough in Gimp or Photoshop.</p>
<p>The tilt, though, is cool if you want your in-focus area to be a &#8220;ramp&#8221; instead of a vertical plane.</p>
<p>Still, I&#8217;d rather have a DC (defocus-control) lens so I can get better <a href="http://www.aguntherphotography.com/reviews/bokeh.html" rel="nofollow">bokeh</a> in portrait shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
